02/14/2005 Case Announcements - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Supreme Court Decision

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Ohio Court Cases and Opinions - Ohio Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH

This court case was taken from the web sites of the Ohio Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

February 14, 2005

[Cite as 02/14/2005 Case Announcements, 2005-Ohio-540.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2004-1169. Jones v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Summit App. No. 21724, 2004-Ohio-2821. This cause is pending before the court
as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Summit County. Upon consideration of
the motion of amicus curiae Ohio Management Lawyers' Association for leave to
file a response to appellees' motion for leave to dismiss claim with prejudice and
motion for remand,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, granted.

DISCIPLINARY CASES

2004-2034. Disciplinary Counsel v. Haggins.
On February 9, 2005, respondent filed a motion for extension of time to reply to an
order to show cause. S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(3)(B)(1) prohibits the filing of a request for
extension of time to file a response beyond the date set by the court's order.
Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for extension be,
and hereby is, stricken.

2005-0028. In re Punka.
On January 6, 2005, and pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(3), the Secretary of the
Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of
Ohio certified to the Supreme Court a certified copy of a judgment entry of a
felony conviction against Anthony Punka, an attorney licensed to practice law in
the state of Ohio.

Upon consideration thereof and pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4), it is
ordered and decreed that Anthony Punka, Attorney Registration No. 0023869, last

known business address in Norton, Ohio, be, and hereby is, suspended from the
practice of law for an interim period, effective as of the date of this entry.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be, and is hereby, referred to
the Disciplinary Counsel for investigation and commencement of disciplinary
proceedings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent immediately cease and desist
from the practice of law in any form and is hereby forbidden to appear on behalf of
another before any court, judge, commission, board, administrative agency or other
public authority.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, effective immediately, respondent be
forbidden to counsel or advise, or prepare legal instruments for others or in any
manner perform legal services for others.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is hereby divested of each, any
and all of the rights, privileges and prerogatives customarily accorded to a member
in good standing of the legal profession of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(3)(G),
respondent shall complete one credit hour of continuing legal education for each
month, or portion of a month of the suspension. As part of the total credit hours of
continuing legal education required by Gov.Bar R. X(3)(G), respondent shall
complete one credit hour of instruction related to professional conduct required by
Gov.Bar R. X(3)(A)(1), for each six months, or portion of six months, of the
suspension.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall not be reinstated to the
practice of law in Ohio until (1) respondent complies with the requirements for
reinstatement set forth in the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar
of Ohio; (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders issued by this court;
(3) respondent complies with the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the
Bar of Ohio; and (4) this court orders respondent reinstated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, by the court, that within 90 days
of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been
awarded by the Clients' Security Fund pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F). It is
further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, after the date of this order, the
Clients' Security Fund awards any amount against the respondent pursuant to
Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Clients'
Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of such award.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before 30 days from the date of this
order, respondent shall:

1. Notify all clients being represented in pending matters and any co-
counsel of respondent's suspension and consequent disqualification to act as
2
02-14-05

an attorney after the effective date of this order and, in the absence of co-
counsel, also notify the clients to seek legal service elsewhere, calling
attention to any urgency in seeking the substitution of another attorney in
respondent's place;
2. Regardless of any fees or expenses due respondent, deliver to all clients
being represented in pending matters any papers or other property pertaining
to the client, or notify the clients or co-counsel, if any, of a suitable time and
place where the papers or other property may be obtained, calling attention
to any urgency for obtaining such papers or other property;
3. Refund any part of any fees or expenses paid in advance that are
unearned or not paid, and account for any trust money or property in
respondent's possession or control;
4. Notify opposing counsel in pending litigation or, in the absence of
counsel, the adverse parties of respondent's disqualification to act as an
attorney after the effective date of this order, and file a notice of
disqualification of respondent with the court or agency before which the
litigation is pending for inclusion in the respective file or files;
5. Send all such notices required by this order by certified mail with a return
address where communications may thereafter be directed to respondent;
6. File with the Clerk of this court and the Disciplinary Counsel of the
Supreme Court an affidavit showing compliance with this order, showing
proof of service of notices required herein, and setting forth the address
where the affiant may receive communications; and
7. Retain and maintain a record of the various steps taken by respondent
pursuant to this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall keep the Clerk and the
Disciplinary Counsel advised of any change of address where respondent may
receive communications.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this
court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of
Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number,
and timeliness of filings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that service shall be deemed made
on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, by certified
mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the Attorney Registration
Section.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs
of publication.
3
02-14-05

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell and
Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

2005-0051. In re Redfield.
On January 10, 2005, and pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A), the Secretary of the
Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of
Ohio submitted to this court a certified copy of a determination of default of a child
support order by Bernard Redfield, an attorney licensed to practice law in the state
of Ohio.
Upon
consideration
thereof
and
pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4), it is
ordered and decreed that Bernard Redfield, Attorney Registration No. 0024600,
last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio, be, and hereby is, suspended from
the practice of law for an interim period, effective as of the date of this entry.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be, and hereby is, referred to
the Disciplinary Counsel for investigation and commencement of disciplinary
proceedings.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Bernard Redfield immediately cease and
desist from the practice of law in any form and hereby is forbidden to appear on
behalf of another before any court, judge, commission, board, administrative
agency or other public authority.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, effective immediately, he be forbidden to
counsel or advise, or prepare legal instruments for others or in any manner perform
legal services for others.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that he hereby is divested of each, any and all
of the rights, privileges and prerogatives customarily accorded to a member in
good standing of the legal profession of Ohio.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall not be reinstated to the
practice of law until (1) the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline
files in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1)(b) with the Supreme Court a
certified copy of a judgment entry reversing the determination of default under a
child support order, or it files in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1)(c) with
the Supreme Court a notice from a court or child support enforcement agency that
respondent is no longer in default under a child support order or is subject to a
withholding or deduction notice or a new or modified child support order to collect
current support or any arrearage due under the child support order that was in
default and is complying with that notice or order, and (2) this court orders
respondent reinstated to the practice of law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall keep the Clerk and the
Disciplinary Counsel advised of any change of address where respondent may
receive communications.
4
02-14-05

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this
court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of
Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number,
and timeliness of filings.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that service shall be deemed made
on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, by certified
mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the attorney registration
office.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs
of publication.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell and
Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2004-1936. State ex rel. Rock v. School Emp. Retirement Bd.
Franklin App. No. 99AP-1474, 2004-Ohio-5268. This cause is pending before the
court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. It appears from
the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due February 1,
2005, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore
has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration
thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed
sua sponte.

2004-1968. Strongsville Lodging Assoc. 1, Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of
Revision.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2004-R-266. This cause is pending before the court as
an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. It appears from the records of this court
that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due February 8, 2005, in compliance with
the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute
this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed
sua sponte.

MEDIATION REFERRALS

5
02-14-05

The following cases have been referred to mediation pursuant to
S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6):

2004-2128. Payphone Assn. of Ohio v. Pub. Util. Comm.
Public Utilities Commission, No. 96-1310-TP-COI.

2005-0230. State ex rel. Pence v. Indus. Comm.
Franklin App. No. 04AP-124, 2004-Ohio-7052.

The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to
S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(E):

2004-2051. State ex rel. Stoops Freightliner v. Roop.
Franklin App. No. 03AP-1273, 2004-Ohio-5543.

6
02-14-05