Fifth Circuit Court Cases - Case Law and Opinions from the 5th Circuit Federal Court - Court of Appeals

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions - 5th Circuit
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE

This opinion or court case is from the Fifth Circuit Court or Appeals. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
In the
October 12, 2004
United States Court of Appeals
Charles R. Fulbruge III
for the Fifth Circuit
Clerk
_______________
m 01-10891
_______________
RUBY R. CALAD,
Plaintiff-Appellant-
Cross-Appellee,
WALTER PATRICK THORN,
Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee,
VERSUS
CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED,
DOING BUSINESS AS HEALTHSOURCE,
DOING BUSINESS AS CIGNA CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee,
AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE;
AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE OF NORTH TEXAS, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees-
Cross-Appellants.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

_______________
m 01-10905
_______________
JUAN DAVILA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE, INC.;
AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE OF NORTH TEXAS, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
Dist. Ct. m 3:00-CV-2368-D (5th Cir. Nos. 01-10891, 01-10905)
Dist. Ct. m 3:00-CV-2693-H (5th Cir. m 01-10891)
_________________________
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before SMITH and BENAVIDES,
U.S. ___, 124 S. Ct. 2488 (2004). We re-
Circuit Judges.*
quested and have received letters from the
parties advising of their respective positions
PER CURIAM:
regarding the appropriate action to be taken by
this court on remand. The parties appear to
The Supreme Court reversed and remanded
agree that this litigation is at an end. Plaintiffs
this panel's opinion. See Roark v. Humana,
Calad and Davila have nonsuited their actions
Inc., 307 F.3d 298 (5th Cir. 2002), reversed
in state court.
sub nom. Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila, ___
Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED.
All costs are taxed against the plaintiffs.
* Judge Parker was a member of this panel but
resigned from the court after the initial opinion was
issued. This matter is now decided by a quorum.
See 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).