|
ROMINGER
LEGAL
|
||||||||||
|
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions -
5th Circuit
|
||||||||||
| Need Legal Help? | ||||||||||
|
NOT FINDING
WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE
|
||||||||||
This
opinion or court case is from the Fifth Circuit Court or Appeals.
Search our site for more cases - CLICK
HERE |
|
|
Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 6, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50901 RALPH NADER, Candidate for President of the United States; STEPHEN E. SMAHA; SUZANNE RUSSO; and LUCRETIA KRAUSE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus GEOFFREY S. CONNOR, Secretary of State for the State of Texas, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs-Appellants Ralph Nader, et al., appeal from the district court's decision denying their First and Fourteenth Amendment constitutional challenges to the Texas Election Code, specifically sections 192.32(a), 192.32(b)(3)(A), 192.32(c), and 192.32(d). Essentially for the reasons as well stated in the district court's memorandum opinion, Nader v. Connor, --- F. Supp. 2d ---, 2004 WL 2002248 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 1, 2004), we AFFIRM that court's final judgment declaring the challenged Texas Election Code provisions legal and constitutional. AFFIRMED. 2 |
|
|
NOW - CASE
LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try
it for FREE
We
now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!
Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board
Find An Attorney
TERMS
OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES
Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2010.
A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.