ROMINGER
LEGAL
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions -
5th Circuit
NOT FINDING
WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE
|
ROMINGER
LEGAL
|
||||||||||
|
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions -
5th Circuit
|
||||||||||
| Need Legal Help? | ||||||||||
|
NOT FINDING
WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This
opinion or court case is from the Fifth Circuit Court or Appeals.
Search our site for more cases - CLICK
HERE |
|
|
Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 913693 Summary Calendar. CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC., PlaintiffAppellee, v. Paul H. TEMPLET, Ph.D., Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, DefendantAppellant. Aug. 10, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana. Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. REAVLEY, Circuit Judge: Louisiana prohibits the importation, storage, treatment, and disposal on Louisiana soil of hazardous wastes that are generated in foreign nations. LA.REV.STAT.ANN. §§ 30:219091 (West 1989). The district court declared that these statutes are unconstitutional intrusions on Congress' dormant commerce power. Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Templet, 770 F.Supp. 1142, 1153 (M.D.La.1991). The Supreme Court recently held that the Commerce Clause prohibits Alabama from exacting a greater hazardous-waste-disposal tax for hazardous materials generated outside Alabama than it does for those generated in-state despite Maine v. Taylor, 477 U.S. 131, 106 S.Ct. 2440, 91 L.Ed.2d 110 (1986), and the quarantine cases cited by appellant Louisiana in its appeal of this case. Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt, U.S. , , 112 S.Ct. 2009, 201617, 119 L.Ed.2d 121 (1992). So we must affirm the district court's decision unless Louisiana presents an argument that was inapplicable to Hunt's facts and prevents operation of the dormant Commerce Clause. Louisiana argues that Congress, through the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901 et seq. (RCRA), and the Environmental Protection Agency, authorized Louisiana's entire hazardous waste program as a satisfactory replacement for the federal minimum standards, thus rendering the challenged statutes an exercise of Congress' commerce power rather than an affront to it. But we may only find that Congress has permitted states to legislate in derogation of interstate commerce upon an "unmistakably clear ... expression of approval by Congress." SouthCentral Timber Dev., Inc. v. Wunnicke, 467 U.S. 82, 9192, 104 S.Ct. 2237, 224243, 81 L.Ed.2d 71 (1984). The Fourth Circuit has held that South Carolina failed to present evidence "indicat[ing] an unmistakably clear congressional intent to permit states to burden interstate commerce" in the RCRA. Hazardous Waste Treatment Council v. South Carolina, 945 F.2d 781, 792 (4th Cir.1991). Nor does Louisiana present any such evidence in this case. In fact, the RCRA could be read to prohibit state hazardous-waste legislation that burdens interstate commerce. See RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6926(b) (state hazardous-waste programs must be "consistent with the Federal or State programs applicable in other States"); H.R.REP. No. 1491, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 30 (1976), reprinted in 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 6238, 6268 ("general purpose of having federal minimum standards for hazardous waste disposal, with the option of state implementation of state programs equivalent to the federal program, is (1) it pro vides uniformity among the states as to how hazardous wastes are regulated ..."). AFFIRMED. |
|
|
NOW - CASE
LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try
it for FREE
We
now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!
Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board
Find An Attorney
TERMS
OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES
Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2010.
A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.
