Fifth Circuit Court Cases - Case Law and Opinions from the 5th Circuit Federal Court - Court of Appeals

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions - 5th Circuit
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE

This opinion or court case is from the Fifth Circuit Court or Appeals. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
No. 92-2561
Summary Calendar.
W.J. SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff,
Wood F. Jones and Mary L. Jones, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
COMMERCIAL STATE BANK OF EL CAMPO, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
May 12, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
Before JOLLY, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We are called upon to visit the bankruptcy and related proceedings of the Jones' and their
corporation for the third time. Briefly stated, this appeal raises the question whether the failure of
the Trustee appointed by the bankruptcy court to qualify as trustee (he failed to post a bond) deprives
the bankruptcy court of jurisdiction to approve a settlement of litigation between the bankruptcy
estate and the bankrupts' former banker.
It does not. A proceeding to determine the acceptability of agreements compromising claims
of the bankruptcy estate is a core proceeding which can be finally heard and determined by the
bankruptcy court subject to review by the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2); see In re Case, 937
F.2d 1014 (5t h Cir.1991). Moreover, the bankruptcy code expressly provides, "A vacancy in the
office of trustee during a case does not abate any pending action or proceeding." 11 U.S.C. § 325.
Numerous other courts have held that the failure of a "de facto" bankruptcy trustee to qualify does
not invalidate the trustee's pre-qualification acts. See Sharfsin v. United States, 265 F. 916, 918 (4th
Cir.1920); In re Martinez, 355 F.Supp. 650, 654 (D.C.P.R.1972); In re Holiday Isles, Ltd., 29 B.R.
827, 829-31 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1983); In re Upright, 1 B.R. 694, 698 (Bankr.N.D.N.Y.1979).
The judgment of the district court is