Fifth Circuit Court Cases - Case Law and Opinions from the 5th Circuit Federal Court - Court of Appeals

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions - 5th Circuit
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE

This opinion or court case is from the Fifth Circuit Court or Appeals. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
No. 93-3544
_______________________
KENNETH J. ARENSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER, ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
_________________________________________________________________
(May 11, 1995)
On Petition for Rehearing
Before JONES, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant Kenneth J. Arenson petitions this Court on
rehearing for a clear ruling on his claim to attorney's fees,
interest on his judgment, and relief based on his Title VII claim.
For purposes of clarification, we confirm that Arenson is entitled
to attorney's fees as a prevailing party at trial and on appeal and
to interest. We remand to the district court for determination of
*
Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no
precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-
settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on
the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published.

a reasonable fee and appropriate interest. However, Appellant's
request for Title VII relief is denied because Arenson waived his
Title VII claim by failing to seek a ruling on that issue from the
Arenson I panel.
Except as specifically granted above, Appellant's
Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. This case is REMANDED to the
district court for determination of a reasonable attorney's fee and
appropriate interest.
Clarification GRANTED; case REMANDED.
2