Fifth Circuit Court Cases - Case Law and Opinions from the 5th Circuit Federal Court - Court of Appeals

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions - 5th Circuit
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE

This opinion or court case is from the Fifth Circuit Court or Appeals. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 93-5396
_____________________
In the matter of: ELRAY and JEAN RASH.
Debtor.
ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
ELRAY RASH and JEAN E. RASH,
Appellees.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
_________________________________________________________________
July 28, 1997
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REYNALDO G. GARZA, KING, JOLLY,
DAVIS, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS,
BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*
PER CURIAM:
The Supreme Court of the United States reversed the judgment
of this court and remanded the cause to this court for further
proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court.
Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash, ___ U.S. ___, 1997 WL 321231
(1977). This case is remanded to the District Court with
*Judges Garwood, Higginbotham and Jones are recused and did
not participate in this decision.

instructions to remand the case to the Bankruptcy Court for
further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme
Court.
Associates Commercial Corporation shall recover from Elray
Rash and Jean E. Rash $1,751.00 for its costs herein expended.
REMANDED.
2