Fifth Circuit Court Cases - Case Law and Opinions from the 5th Circuit Federal Court - Court of Appeals

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions - 5th Circuit
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE

This opinion or court case is from the Fifth Circuit Court or Appeals. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
No. 96-30704.
Sharon S. DUPRE, Widow of Russell P. Dupre, individually and as natural tutrix of her minor
child, Beau Nicholas Dupre, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., et al., Defendants,
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
April 4, 1997.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Before DAVIS, SMITH and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Following the initial appeal in this case, we remanded it to the district court and directed that
court to det ermine whether, under the facts of this case, Chevron owed Dupre a duty. Dupre v.
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 20 F.3d 154 (5th Cir.1994). The district court considered that question and
answered it in the negative. Dupre then prosecuted this appeal seeking review of that judgment.
We are persuaded that our decisions in Olsen v. Shell Oil Co., 561 F.2d 1178, 1187-90 (5th
Cir.1977), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979, 100 S.Ct. 480, 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979), Bourg v. Texaco Oil
Co., Inc., 578 F.2d 1117, 1121 (5th Cir.1978), and Romero v. Mobil Expl. & Prod'g, N. Am., Inc.,
939 F.2d 307, 310-11 (5th Cir.1991), control this case. We agree with the district court that the
regulations adopted pursuant to the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) provide no basis
for an implied cause of action against Chevron; nor do those regulations create an independent duty
under Louisiana law on the part of Chevron, the platform owner and principal, to protect a
contractor's employee from hazards created by the contractor. See Graham v. Amoco Oil Co., 21
F.3d 643, 648 (5th Cir.1994); Ainsworth v. Shell Offshore, Inc., 829 F.2d 548, 550-51 (5th
Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1034, 108 S.Ct. 1593, 99 L.Ed.2d 908 (1988). Finally, we reject
Dupre's argument that Chevron contractually assumed a duty of reasonable care with respect to the
Sundowner rig under the terms of its lease with the United States, which incorporated the federal

regulations. That argument depends on this court finding that the OCSLA regulations themselves
create a duty under Louisiana negligence law, a position rejected in Romero, 939 F.2d at 311.
AFFIRMED.