ROMINGER LEGAL
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions - 5th Circuit
Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS
NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE
This opinion or court case is from the Fifth Circuit Court or Appeals. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH
COURT REPORTERS
PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS
PROCESS SERVERS
DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS
EXPERT WITNESSES

 

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

 
Web Rominger Legal

Legal News - Legal Headlines

 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60508

LOUISIANA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION

Petitioner
VERSUS
ROBERT BUNOL; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS'
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR

Respondents

Petition for Review of an Order
of The Benefits Review Board

May 12, 2000
Before HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH,
FALLON, District Judge:
Circuit Judges, and FALLON, District
Judge.*
The Louisiana Insurance Guaranty
Association ("LIGA") appeals from a
decision by the Benefits Review Board
* District Judge of the Eastern
("BRB") of the United States Department of
District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.
Labor concerning benefits awarded to
1

Robert Bunol pursuant to the Longshore
because his employer went out of business.1
and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act
LIGA moved to reconsider the ruling of the
("LHWCA"). Because we find that
ALJ, but its motion was denied. On appeal,
substantial evidence supports the
the BRB remanded the case to another ALJ
determination of the BRB, we affirm.
who granted LIGA's request for
I.
modification. The second ALJ ordered
Robert J. Bunol, Sr. was a diesel
LIGA to pay compensation for temporary
mechanic who was injured in February and
total disability benefits from August 1, 1979
again in August of 1979 while working for
through September 4, 1979, and from April
the George Engine Company in Harvey,
28, 1980 through July 9, 1980 based on an
Louisiana. He suffered injuries to his back
average weekly wage of $452.13.
and spine and underwent surgery on April
The ALJ further ordered LIGA to pay
28, 1980. Following his operation, Bunol
permanent partial disability benefits for the
worked in the repair shop, became an
period from September 1, 1988 through
instructor, and ultimately resumed his full
August 1, 1990 based on an average weekly
duties six months to a year later.
wage of $452.12 and a residual earning
In March, 1988, Bunol was laid off from
capacity of $188.25. For August 2, 1990 to
his job when the George Engine Company
August 31, 1993, Bunol was awarded a
went bankrupt. He then began working for
residual earning capacity of $150.42, and
his brother's insurance company in
from September 1, 1993 onward a residual
September, 1988 until it was sold in
earning capacity of $160.80. The second
August, 1990. Since 1990, he has not
ALJ, however, relieved LIGA of its duty to
returned to any work.
pay benefits for the period from 1980 to
Bunol filed a complaint for benefits
1988.
under the LHWCA after losing his job at
Bunol appealed and LIGA cross
the insurance company. An administrative
appealed the second ALJ decision. The BRB
law judge ("ALJ") found that Bunol failed
affirmed the findings of the ALJ and also
to provide his employer with sufficient
reinstated the award of the first ALJ for
notice of the February, 1979 injury and
permanent partial disability compensation for
therefore was not entitled to disability
the period from 1980 through 1988. LIGA
benefits. The ALJ did, however, award
now appeals the second BRB decision to this
Bunol benefits related to his August, 1979
court.
claim. Bunol received temporary total
II.
disability benefits at a compensation rate of
We review an appeal from a decision by
$306.91, based on a weekly wage of
the BRB de novo. Sketoe v. Exxon Co.,
$460.37, for the period between the date of
USA, 188 F.3d 596, 597 (5th Cir. 1999). In
the accident until December 18, 1980.
reviewing a decision of the BRB, we only
Thereafter, Bunol was entitled to permanent
consider whether the BRB correctly found
partial disability benefits at a weekly rate of
$146.66 based on a residual wage capacity
of $240.38.
1 The Louisiana Legislature created
Bunol sought compensation from LIGA
LIGA to cover claims against bankrupt
employers and their insurers. See La. Stat.
Ann. § 22:1375, et. seq.
2

that the ALJ's findings of fact are supported
erred in determining the causal relationship
by substantial evidence and consistent with
between Bunol's disability and any work-
the law. See Avondale Indus. v. Director,
related accident. When Bunol claimed
OWCP 977 F.2d 186, 189 (5th Cir.1990).
compensation under the LHWCA, the law
"[W]e may not substitute [our] judgment
afforded him a presumption that his injury
for that of the ALJ, nor may we reweigh or
arose out of and in the course of his
reappraise the evidence, instead we inquire
employment. See 33 U.S.C. § 920(a). Once
whether there was evidence supporting the
the presumption is invoked, the burden shifts
ALJ's factual findings." Boland Marine &
to the employer to rebut the presumption
Manufact. Co. v. Rihner, 41 F.3d 997, 1002
with substantial evidence that his condition
(5th Cir. 1995) (quoting Empire United
was not caused or aggravated by his
Stevedores v. Gatlin, 936 F.2d 819, 822 (5th
employment. See Noble Drilling Co. v.
Cir. 1991)). Therefore, "we must affirm
Drake, 795 F.2d 478, 481 (5th Cir. 1986). If
decisions that conclude correctly that the
the employer meets this standard, then the
ALJ's findings are supported by substantial
presumption disappears. Id.
evidence and are in accordance with the
LIGA fails to overcome its burden. The
law." Darby v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc.,
evidence considered by the ALJ and
99 F.3d 685, 688 (5th Cir. 1996).
reviewed by the BRB shows that Bunol went
A.
to see his doctor either the day of or the day
LIGA argues that the evidence in the
after his July 31, 1979 injury. He reported
record is insufficient to support the
the injury to the employer who in turn filed a
conclusions of the BRB. First, LIGA
report. Although LIGA contends that the
suggests that the BRB erred in determining
testimony of Bunol's doctor indicates that he
the causal relationship between Bunol's
thought he was treating the injury of
disability and any work-related accident.2
February, 1979, the ALJ as fact finder
LIGA next asserts that sufficient evidence
determines the credibility of witnesses and
supports neither the BRB's findings
decides issues of conflicting evidence. See
regarding the nature and extent of Bunol's
Avondale Indus., 977 F.2d at 189. LIGA
disability nor its determination of the
presents no evidence to challenge the ALJ
average weekly wage afforded to Bunol.
determination, and we therefore find the
LIGA then argues that Bunol was not
conclusion of the BRB to be supported by
injured on a situs covered by the LHWCA.
substantial evidence.
Finally, LIGA disputes the BRB's
C.
determination concerning Bunol's residual
LIGA next contends that the evidence
wage earning capacity and demonstration of
considered by the ALJ and the BRB is
suitable alternative employment.
insufficient to sustain a finding that Bunol
B.
had worked in pain and with a decreased
We first consider whether the BRB
earning capacity sufficient to justify partial
disability benefits for the period from 1980
to 1988.
2 We need not reach the issue of
Bunol bears the initial burden of
whether the BRB's decision was issued
demonstrating that he cannot return to his
timely because Bunol adopts the argument
usual work in order to establish a prima
of LIGA in its brief.
3

facie case for total disability. If he meets
Bunol did work failed to fairly represent an
this burden, then his employer must
entire year of work. Therefore, the ALJ
establish the availability of suitable
applied the methodology of section 910(c)
alternative employment. See P&M Crane
that provides a formula to calculate average
Co., 930 F.2d 424 (5th Cir. 1991). Even if
weekly wages when the other standards
able to work, Bunol may be found to be
"cannot reasonably and fairly be applied."
totally disabled if he is working with
Id. § 910(c). The BRB affirmed.
extraordinary effort and in excruciating
The courts give broad discretion to ALJs
pain. See Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Patterson,
in determining appropriate wage awards. See
846 F.2d 715 (11th Cir. 1988). These
National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. v.
factors are also relevant in determining an
Bonner, 600 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir. 1979).
award of permanent partial disability and
LIGA offers no evidence to rebut the
wage-earning capacity after an injury. See
conclusion of the ALJ. Rather, LIGA
33 U.S.C. § 908(c)(21)(h).
suggests an alternative method for
Both ALJs found that Bunol worked in
calculating his wage. The ALJ made no
substantial pain from 1980 to 1988. In its
error of law by applying section 910(c) and
decision, the BRB notes that Bunol testified
found that the evidence showed Bunol had
that he worked in constant pain and that his
not worked substantially the whole year and
doctor placed restrictions on his physical
therefore did not satisfy the section 910(a)
activities at work. LIGA offers no evidence
criteria. Thus, we do not find that the BRB
to rebut the findings of the BRB.
erred in affirming the ALJ decision.
Therefore, according to our standard of
E.
review, we find that the BRB properly
LIGA additionally asserts that sufficient
found that Bunol worked in pain and is
evidence does not demonstrate that Bunol's
entitled to benefits for the period from 1980
injury occurred on a covered situs. Section
to 1988.
3(a) of the LHWCA restricts compensation
D.
awards to injuries "occurring on the
LIGA further insists that the BRB
navigable waters of the United States
improperly calculated Bunol's average
(including any adjoining pier, wharf, dry
weekly wage to determine his benefits. The
dock, terminal, building way, marine railway,
methods for calculating average weekly
or other adjoining area customarily used by
wages are listed at 33 U.S.C. section 910.
an employer in loading, unloading, repairing,
LIGA contends that the ALJ should have
dismantling, or building a vessel)." 33
applied section 910(a) rather than section
U.S.C. § 903(a).
910(c) to determine his average weekly
LIGA claims that evidence exists to
wage because Bunol worked "substantially
support a finding by the ALJ that Bunol's
the whole of the year." See 33 U.S.C. §
accident occurred in a field in Baton Rouge
910(a) (providing the computation formula
or on a dock in Harvey. The ALJ, however,
for injured employees who worked "during
found that the evidence showed that the
substantially the whole of the year
injury occurred on the dock. The BRB
immediately preceding injury"). Id.
further concluded that Bunol's employer
The ALJ determined that section 910(c)
conducted maritime activity at this facility.
applied because the forty-two weeks that
Again, the ALJ weighed conflicting evidence
4

and rendered a decision that a reasonable
mind might accept as adequate to support a
conclusion. See Avondale Indus., 977 F.2d
at 189 (defining "substantial evidence" as
evidence that provides a substantial basis of
fact from which can be reasonably inferred)
(internal quotation omitted). Therefore, we
find that the evidence supports the BRB's
determination that Bunol's injury occurred
on a situs covered by the LHWCA.
F.
Finally, LIGA disputes the BRB's
determination concerning Bunol's residual
wage earning capacity and demonstration of
suitable alternative employment.3 LIGA
again provides no evidence to challenge the
findings of the BRB. We may not second-
guess the determinations of the ALJ and the
BRB absent a showing that substantial
evidence does not support their conclusions.
See Rihner, 41 F.3d at 1002. Accordingly,
we find that the record supports the fact-
finding of the ALJs and the determination of
the BRB.
Respondent's motion to dismiss the petition
for review is MOOT.
AFFIRMED.
3 At oral argument, LIGA's counsel
stated that LIGA challenges, on appeal,
only the BRB's factual determination and
raises no issue as to LIGA's duty, under
these facts, to find suitable alternative
employment. Accordingly, we decide only
the factual issue.
5

Ask a Lawyer

 

 

FREE CASE REVIEW BY A LOCAL LAWYER!
|
|
\/

Personal Injury Law
Accidents
Dog Bite
Legal Malpractice
Medical Malpractice
Other Professional Malpractice
Libel & Slander
Product Liability
Slip & Fall
Torts
Workplace Injury
Wrongful Death
Auto Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bankruptcy
Chapter 7
Chapter 11
Business/Corporate Law
Business Formation
Business Planning
Franchising
Tax Planning
Traffic/Transportation Law
Moving Violations
Routine Infractions
Lemon Law
Manufacturer Defects
Securities Law
Securities Litigation
Shareholder Disputes
Insider Trading
Foreign Investment
Wills & Estates

Wills

Trusts
Estate Planning
Family Law
Adoption
Child Abuse
Child Custody
Child Support
Divorce - Contested
Divorce - Uncontested
Juvenile Criminal Law
Premarital Agreements
Spousal Support
Labor/Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Sexual Harassment
Age Discrimination
Workers Compensation
Real Estate/Property Law
Condemnation / Eminent Domain
Broker Litigation
Title Litigation
Landlord/Tenant
Buying/Selling/Leasing
Foreclosures
Residential Real Estate Litigation
Commercial Real Estate Litigation
Construction Litigation
Banking/Finance Law
Debtor/Creditor
Consumer Protection
Venture Capital
Constitutional Law
Discrimination
Police Misconduct
Sexual Harassment
Privacy Rights
Criminal Law
DUI / DWI / DOI
Assault & Battery
White Collar Crimes
Sex Crimes
Homocide Defense
Civil Law
Insurance Bad Faith
Civil Rights
Contracts
Estate Planning, Wills & Trusts
Litigation/Trials
Social Security
Worker's Compensation
Probate, Will & Trusts
Intellectual Property
Patents
Trademarks
Copyrights
Tax Law
IRS Disputes
Filing/Compliance
Tax Planning
Tax Power of Attorney
Health Care Law
Disability
Elder Law
Government/Specialty Law
Immigration
Education
Trade Law
Agricultural/Environmental
IRS Issues

 


Google
Search Rominger Legal


 


LEGAL HELP FORUM - Potential Client ? Post your question.
LEGAL HELP FORUM - Attorney? Answer Questions, Maybe get hired!

NOW - CASE LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try it for FREE


 


Get Legal News
Enter your Email


Preview

We now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!

ADD A SEARCH ENGINE TO YOUR PAGE!!!

TELL A FRIEND ABOUT ROMINGER LEGAL

Ask Your Legal Question Now.

Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board

Find An Attorney

TERMS OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES

Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2010.

A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.