	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions - 5th Circuit
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE

This opinion or court case is from the Fifth Circuit Court or Appeals. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 99-11397
_____________________
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE
SOUTHWEST, INC.; ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE
SOUTHWEST, INC.;
TAYLOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
versus
CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS,
Defendant,
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE
COMPANY,
Appellant.
________________________________
CAPROCK COMMUNICATIONS CORP.;
GOLDEN HARBOR OF TEXAS, INC.;
WESTEL, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
versus
CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS,
Defendant,
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,
Appellant.

__________________________________
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, LP,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS,
Defendant,
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,
Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Texas
_________________________________________________________________
April 17, 2001
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
(Opinion April 17, 2001, 5th Cir. 2001, _____F.3d_____)
Before HILL,* JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
The petition for rehearing filed by Sprint Communications
Company is DENIED.
On March 26, 2001, Teligent, Inc. submitted a letter
requesting a correction in the language of the March 15, 2001
opinion in this case. Treating the letter as a petition for
rehearing, the petition is granted as follows: Footnote ** will be
added after the first sentence of the first paragraph. This
footnote will read as follows:
*Circuit Judge of the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Southwestern Bell filed a motion to dismiss its appeal against
Teligent, Inc. ("Teligent"), which this court granted on March
30, 2000. Thus, the judgment in favor of Teligent is not
affected by this appeal.
In all other respects, the opinion remains unchanged, and all
other relief is DENIED.