Florida Court Cases - Case Law and Opinions from the Courts of Florida - unoffical reports - Opinions

ROMINGER LEGAL

Florida Case Law & Florida Court Opinions - Florida Law

Need Legal Help?

LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER

LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS

NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE

This court case was taken from the Florida Court's web site. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
ANTHONY SCIPPIO,
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
Appellant,
v.
CASE NO. 1D01-3691
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
___________________________/
Opinion filed September 18, 2003.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.
E. Vernon Douglas, Judge.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Nancy L. Showalter, Assistant Public
Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General and Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorney General,
Tallahassee, for Appellee.
BROWNING, J.
Appellant pled guilty to sale of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school and

possession of cocaine with intent to sell within 1,000 feet of a school, and was
sentenced in accordance with his agreement to serve 14 years of incarceration as a
habitual offender. Appellant now alleges that the trial court erred in sentencing him
as a habitual offender as to the second count, and that the trial court erred in denying
his motion to withdraw his plea. We reverse.
The state concedes the first issue, and correctly so, because a habitual offender
sentence on possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell is illegal. See,
e.g., § 775.084(1)(a)3, Fla. Stat. (2000); Peterson v. State, 743 So. 2d 1134, 1135
(Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Appellant is entitled to relief despite the fact that he agreed to
habitualization as part of his plea. See Bover v. State, 797 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 2001).
Appellant's second issue also requires reversal. Appellant had the right to
conflict-free counsel to argue his motion to withdraw plea. See Lester v. State, 820
So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Wofford v. State, 819 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA
2002). Here, it is clear from the record that Appellant had a conflict with his counsel
insofar as his motion to withdraw plea was concerned; thus, the trial court erred in
failing to appoint conflict-free counsel to represent Appellant. See Bullard v. State,
2003 WL 22002696 (Fla. 1st DCA Aug. 26, 2003); Jones v. State, 827 So. 2d 1086
(Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
Accordingly, we REVERSE the sentence and the order denying the motion to
2

withdraw the plea, and REMAND for resentencing. Should the state not agree to
resentencing, Appellant may withdraw his plea and the matter, including all charges
filed against Appellant, shall proceed to trial. Should the state agree to resentencing,
Appellant may, after appointment of conflict-free counsel, present his motion for
withdrawal of plea for disposition. See Clay v State, 750 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA
2000).
BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.
3

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Florida Case Law & Florida Court Opinions - Florida Law
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE