|
ROMINGER
LEGAL
|
||||||||||
|
Florida Case Law & Florida Court Opinions -
Florida Law
|
||||||||||
| Need Legal Help? | ||||||||||
|
NOT FINDING
WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE
|
||||||||||
This
court case was taken from the Florida Court's web site. Search our site
for more cases - CLICK HERE |
|
|
Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA VIVARINE ECHOLS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED. v. CASE NO. 1D03-90 PALM BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT and F.A. RICHARD & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellees. ____________________________/ Opinion filed March 26, 2004. An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Mary D'Ambrosio, Judge. Gilbert Panzer, West Palm Beach; Bill McCabe, Longwood, for Appellant. Mara Shlackman and Brian P. Knight of Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans & Abel, P.A., Hollywood, for Appellees. PER CURIAM. In this workers' compensation case, the claimant seeks review of a final order denying requests for attorney's fees for the services of her attorney in connection with claims related to her right hand; to her neck, back and right knee; and for EMG/NCV testing. She also seeks review of the denial of her request for costs incurred in taking the deposition of her independent medical examiner. We reverse the denial of the request for attorney's fees for services in connection with the claim related to the right hand because it is not based on competent, substantial evidence. The undisputed evidence establishes that the claim was not timely accepted. The claimant is entitled to a fee pursuant to Gulledge v. Dion Oil Co., 605 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The same is true as to the claim for EMG/NCV testing--the record clearly demonstrates that the testing ultimately received was the result of the efforts of the claimant's attorney. We also reverse the denial of the request for costs incurred in taking the deposition of the claimant's independent medical examiner, Dr. Rubenstein. His testimony was clearly relevant to the compensability of both the claimant's left and right hand conditions, on both of which she prevailed. Accordingly, she is entitled to tax the costs of securing the deposition. See, e.g., Raska v. Glasgow Contracting Co., 588 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Finally, we affirm the denial of a fee for services attributable to the claim related to the neck, back and right knee because the reasons given are supported by competent, substantial evidence. In summary, we reverse the denial of the request for attorney's fees for services related to the right hand claim and the claim for EMG/NCV testing; we reverse the 2 denial of costs incurred in taking the deposition of Dr. Rubenstein; and we affirm the denial of the request for attorney's fees for services related to the neck, back and right knee claim. AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART. WEBSTER, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR. 3
|
|
|
NOW - CASE
LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try
it for FREE
We
now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!
Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board
TERMS
OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES
Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2009.
A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.