ROMINGER LEGAL
New Jersey Court Cases and Opinions - NJ Legal Research
Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS
NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -RESEARCH
This court case was taken from the web sites of the NJ Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH
COURT REPORTERS
PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS
PROCESS SERVERS
DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS
EXPERT WITNESSES

 

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

 
Web Rominger Legal

Legal News - Legal Headlines

 

Original MSWord Version
This case can also be found at 183 N.J. 383, 874 A.2d 506.



SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
A-126/127/ 128 September Term 2004



BRET SCHUNDLER, DIANE SANK,
and BRET2005,

    Plaintiffs-Respondents,

        v.

KATHLEEN DONOVAN, in her official
capacity as Bergen County Clerk,
STEVEN LONEGAN, and PAUL DiGAETANO,

    Defendants-Appellants,

        and

JOHN MURPHY, DOUGLAS FORRESTER,
TODD CALIGUIRE, and ROBERT SCHROEDER,

    Defendants,

        and

REPUBLICAN COUNTY CHAIRMAN'S ORGANIZATION
and REPUBLICAN COUNTY COMMITTEES for the
COUNTIES OF BERGEN, BURLINGTON, ESSEX,
HUDSON, HUNTERDON, MERCER, MONMOUTH, OCEAN,
SALEM, SOMERSET, SUSSEX, and PASSAIC,

    Intervenors-Appellants.
----------------------------------------
BRET SCHUNDLER, RICHARD BRADFORD, and
RICHARD BRADFORD a/k/a BRET 2005,

    Plaintiffs,

        v.

JAMES HOGAN, GLOUCESTER COUNTY CLERK, and/or
John Does 1-15 (fictitious defendant(s) who
caused damage to plaintiffs),

    Defendant-Respondent.
-----------------------------------------

FORRESTER FOR GOVERNOR, INC.,
and DOUGLAS FORRESTER, Individually,

    Plaintiff,

        v.

KATHLEEN A. DONOVAN, CLERK OF THE
COUNTY OF BERGEN, and PAUL DiGAETANO,
STEVEN LONEGAN,

    Defendants-Respondents,

        and

PETER HARVEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
NEW JERSEY, TODD CALIGUIRE, JOHN
MURPHY, ROBERT SCHROEDER, and
BRET SCHUNDLER,

    Defendants.

            Submitted May 5, 2005 -- Decided May 6, 2005

            On certification to the Superior Court,
            Appellate Division, whose opinion is
            reported at ____ N.J.Super. _____ (2005).

Ernest P. Fronzuto submitted a brief on
behalf of appellant Paul DiGaetano, et al.
(A-126)(Piro, Zinna, Cifelli, Paris,
& Genitempo, P.C., attorneys).

Steven S. Polinsky submitted letter briefs
on behalf of appellant Steven Lonegan
(A-127).

Mark D. Sheridan submitted briefs on behalf
of appellants Republican County Chairman's
Organizations, etc., et al. (A-128)(Drinker, Biddle & Reath LLP).

John M. Carbone submitted letter briefs on
behalf of respondents Kathleen A. Donovan,
et al. (Carbone and Faasse, attorneys).
Thaddeus R. Maciag submitted a brief on
behalf of respondents Bret Schundler, et al.
(Maciag Law, LLC, Howes & Howes, and Barry, McTiernan & Moore, attorneys; W. Timothy
Howes, and Sean M. Connelly on the brief).

Peter G. Sheridan submitted letter briefs on
behalf of respondents Forrester for Governor, Inc., et al. (Graham, Curtin & Sheridan).

Douglas F. Doyle submitted letter briefs
on behalf of respondent John Murphy (Edwards
& Caldwell, LLC, attorneys; John A. Stone
on the briefs).

    PER CURIAM

    The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division in the opinion of Judge Kestin reported at ___ N.J. Super. ___ (2005).
    We add only the following.
    The Appellate Division suggested several possibilities to achieve the results it ordered, including altered type face and ballot reorganization. We note that N.J.S.A. 19:23-26.1 specifically contemplates such a flexible approach insofar as it provides that “in the case of a primary election for the nomination of a candidate for the office of Governor, the names of all candidates for the office of . . . Governor shall be printed on the official primary ballot in the first column or horizontal row designated for the party of those candidates.” (emphasis added). Accord N.J.S.A. 19:49-2.
    The question has been raised whether the decision of the Appellate Division applies to all twenty-one counties. We hold that it does.
    CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ and JUSTICES LONG, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE, and RIVERA-SOTO join in the Court's opinion. JUSTICE LaVECCHIA did not participate.








This archive is a service of Rominger Legal.

Ask a Lawyer

 

 

FREE CASE REVIEW BY A LOCAL LAWYER!
|
|
\/

Personal Injury Law
Accidents
Dog Bite
Legal Malpractice
Medical Malpractice
Other Professional Malpractice
Libel & Slander
Product Liability
Slip & Fall
Torts
Workplace Injury
Wrongful Death
Auto Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bankruptcy
Chapter 7
Chapter 11
Business/Corporate Law
Business Formation
Business Planning
Franchising
Tax Planning
Traffic/Transportation Law
Moving Violations
Routine Infractions
Lemon Law
Manufacturer Defects
Securities Law
Securities Litigation
Shareholder Disputes
Insider Trading
Foreign Investment
Wills & Estates

Wills

Trusts
Estate Planning
Family Law
Adoption
Child Abuse
Child Custody
Child Support
Divorce - Contested
Divorce - Uncontested
Juvenile Criminal Law
Premarital Agreements
Spousal Support
Labor/Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Sexual Harassment
Age Discrimination
Workers Compensation
Real Estate/Property Law
Condemnation / Eminent Domain
Broker Litigation
Title Litigation
Landlord/Tenant
Buying/Selling/Leasing
Foreclosures
Residential Real Estate Litigation
Commercial Real Estate Litigation
Construction Litigation
Banking/Finance Law
Debtor/Creditor
Consumer Protection
Venture Capital
Constitutional Law
Discrimination
Police Misconduct
Sexual Harassment
Privacy Rights
Criminal Law
DUI / DWI / DOI
Assault & Battery
White Collar Crimes
Sex Crimes
Homocide Defense
Civil Law
Insurance Bad Faith
Civil Rights
Contracts
Estate Planning, Wills & Trusts
Litigation/Trials
Social Security
Worker's Compensation
Probate, Will & Trusts
Intellectual Property
Patents
Trademarks
Copyrights
Tax Law
IRS Disputes
Filing/Compliance
Tax Planning
Tax Power of Attorney
Health Care Law
Disability
Elder Law
Government/Specialty Law
Immigration
Education
Trade Law
Agricultural/Environmental
IRS Issues

 


Google
Search Rominger Legal


 


LEGAL HELP FORUM - Potential Client ? Post your question.
LEGAL HELP FORUM - Attorney? Answer Questions, Maybe get hired!

NOW - CASE LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try it for FREE


 


Get Legal News
Enter your Email


Preview

We now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!

ADD A SEARCH ENGINE TO YOUR PAGE!!!

TELL A FRIEND ABOUT ROMINGER LEGAL

Ask Your Legal Question Now.

Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board

TERMS OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES

Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2009.

A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.