Pennsylvania Supreme Court Cases - Supreme Court Case Law from PA - Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Microsoft Word - 01-19-99w.doc

	ROMINGER LEGAL
		Pennsylvania Court Cases and Opinions - PA Legal Research
					Need Legal Help?
					Need Legal Help?
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER
LEGAL RESEARCH CENTER			LEGAL HEADLINES - CASE LAW - LEGAL FORMS	NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE

This opinion or court case was taken from the Pennsylvania Courts. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

MOST CURRENT PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT CASES

LEGAL RESEARCH

COURT REPORTERS

PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

PROCESS SERVERS

DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS

EXPERT WITNESSES

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

Legal News - Legal Headlines

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WESTERN DISTRICT
January 19, 1999 - Cases DECIDED and Judgments entered in the following:
Flaherty, C.J.
ROBERT SMITH AND GAYLE RUSCH
No. 0094 W.D. Appeal Docket 1997
v. MICHAEL F. COYNE,
[J-161-1998]
PROTHONOTARY OF ALLEGHENY
COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, AND
CARMEN NOBILE
APPEAL OF: LANDLORD SERVICE
BUREAU, INC.
ROBERT SMITH AND GAYLE RUSCH
No. 0096 W.D. Appeal Docket 1997
v. MICHAEL F. COYNE,
PROTHONOTARY OF ALLEGHENY
COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, AND
CARMEN NOBILE
APPEAL OF: AMERICAN CONGRESS
OF REAL ESTATE, INC.
ROBERT SMITH AND GAYLE RUSCH
No. 0097 W.D. Appeal Docket 1997
v. MICHAEL F. COYNE,
PROTHONOTARY OF ALLEGHENY
COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA AND
CARMEN NOBILE
APPEAL OF: APARTMENT
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN
PITTSBURGH, APARTMENT
ASSOCIATION OF GREATER
PHILADELPHIA, HOUSING AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND
PITTSBURGH FACTORS
-1-

THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS IS VACATED AND THE
CASES ARE REMANDED FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS
OPINION.
MESSRS. JUSTICE ZAPPALA AND CASTILLE DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE
CONSIDERATION OR DECISION OF THIS CASE.
MR. JUSTICE CAPPY FILES A CONCURRING OPINION IN WHICH MR. JUSTICE
NIGRO JOINS.
Castille, J.
IN RE: SUSPENSION OF THE CAPITAL
No. 110 W.D. Miscellaneous Docket 1997
UNITARY REVIEW ACT AND RELATED
SECTIONS OF ACT NO. 1995-32 (SS1);
and AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 1500 OF
THE RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
THE PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED.
-2-