ROMINGER LEGAL
Virginia Legal Research & Resources - VA Legal Resources
Need Legal Help?
NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE
This opinion or court case is from the Courts of Virginia. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH
COURT REPORTERS
PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS
PROCESS SERVERS
DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS
EXPERT WITNESSES

 

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

 
Web Rominger Legal

Legal News - Legal Headlines

 

                 COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA



Present:  Judges Benton, Willis and Elder
Argued at Richmond, Virginia


ROBERT THRIFT, BARBARA THRIFT
AND NANCY ANN THRIFT
                                          OPINION BY
v.           Record No. 0015-96-2     JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR.
                                                                                   AUGUST 6, 1996
ALAN BALDWIN AND CHARON BALDWIN


        FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY
                 Joseph E. Spruill, Jr., Judge

         George W. Townsend, III, for appellants.

         Charles J. McKerns, Jr. (McKerns & McKerns,
         on brief), for appellees.


    Dale and Nancy Thrift were the parents of five children:
Nancy Ann, Dale, Christy, Brenda, and Kelly.  The eldest child,
Nancy Ann, was adopted by her paternal grandparents, Robert and
Barbara Thrift.  On January 10, 1990, the Department of Social
Services removed the four younger children from their parents'
home.  Dale, Christy, and Brenda were adopted by Alan and Charon
Baldwin.  The youngest child, Kelly, was adopted by another
family and is not involved in this appeal.
    Robert and Barbara Thrift, biological paternal grandparents,
and Nancy Ann Thrift, biological sibling, (hereinafter referred
to collectively as the Thrifts) petitioned the juvenile and
domestic relations district court for visitation with the three
children adopted by the Baldwins (the children).  The juvenile
and domestic relations district court granted visitation and the
Baldwins appealed to the trial court, which concluded "that the
adoption proceedings which severed the tie between parent and
child also severed the tie between grandparent and grandchild.
. . . [The children's] legal ties to Mr. and Mrs. Thrift were
dissolved.  Therefore, the petitioners do not have standing to
maintain this proceeding."  The trial court did not consider the
case on the merits, but dismissed the Thrifts' petition for lack
of standing.  We hold that this ruling was erroneous and reverse
the judgment of the trial court.
    Code   16.1-241(A) provides, in pertinent part:
    The authority of the juvenile court to adjudicate
    matters involving the . . . visitation . . . of a child
    shall not be limited to the consideration of petitions
    filed by a mother, father or legal guardian but shall
    include petitions filed at any time by any party with a
    legitimate interest therein.  A party with a legitimate
    interest shall be broadly construed and shall include,
    but not be limited to, grandparents and other blood
    relatives and family members.
    The statute enjoins a broad construction of the term "[a]
party with a legitimate interest."  We hold that this term means
not only a party possessed of legal rights with respect to the
child, but also any party having a cognizable and reasonable
interest in maintaining a close relationship with the child.  The
statute expressly provides that the term shall include
"grandparents and other blood relatives."  Although the adoption
of the children by the Baldwins extinguished the Thrifts' legal
grandparental and sibling relationship, see Code   63.1-233; see
also Cage v. Harrisonburg Dep't of Social Services, 13 Va. App.
246, 410 S.E.2d 405 (1991), the blood relationship continues.
Code   16.1-241(A) expressly confers standing to seek visitation.
              This holding addresses only standing to seek visitation, not
the right to enjoy visitation.  The determination of visitation
must be made by a properly constituted court, upon a hearing on
the merits, in accordance with well-established standards.  
    We hold that the trial court erred in ruling that the
Thrifts lacked standing to seek visitation and in dismissing
their petition on that ground without a hearing on the merits.
Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and
remand the case to it with direction to reinstate the petition
and to consider the matter on its merits.
                   Reversed and remanded.
                                                         

Ask a Lawyer

 

 

FREE CASE REVIEW BY A LOCAL LAWYER!
|
|
\/

Personal Injury Law
Accidents
Dog Bite
Legal Malpractice
Medical Malpractice
Other Professional Malpractice
Libel & Slander
Product Liability
Slip & Fall
Torts
Workplace Injury
Wrongful Death
Auto Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bankruptcy
Chapter 7
Chapter 11
Business/Corporate Law
Business Formation
Business Planning
Franchising
Tax Planning
Traffic/Transportation Law
Moving Violations
Routine Infractions
Lemon Law
Manufacturer Defects
Securities Law
Securities Litigation
Shareholder Disputes
Insider Trading
Foreign Investment
Wills & Estates

Wills

Trusts
Estate Planning
Family Law
Adoption
Child Abuse
Child Custody
Child Support
Divorce - Contested
Divorce - Uncontested
Juvenile Criminal Law
Premarital Agreements
Spousal Support
Labor/Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Sexual Harassment
Age Discrimination
Workers Compensation
Real Estate/Property Law
Condemnation / Eminent Domain
Broker Litigation
Title Litigation
Landlord/Tenant
Buying/Selling/Leasing
Foreclosures
Residential Real Estate Litigation
Commercial Real Estate Litigation
Construction Litigation
Banking/Finance Law
Debtor/Creditor
Consumer Protection
Venture Capital
Constitutional Law
Discrimination
Police Misconduct
Sexual Harassment
Privacy Rights
Criminal Law
DUI / DWI / DOI
Assault & Battery
White Collar Crimes
Sex Crimes
Homocide Defense
Civil Law
Insurance Bad Faith
Civil Rights
Contracts
Estate Planning, Wills & Trusts
Litigation/Trials
Social Security
Worker's Compensation
Probate, Will & Trusts
Intellectual Property
Patents
Trademarks
Copyrights
Tax Law
IRS Disputes
Filing/Compliance
Tax Planning
Tax Power of Attorney
Health Care Law
Disability
Elder Law
Government/Specialty Law
Immigration
Education
Trade Law
Agricultural/Environmental
IRS Issues

 


Google
Search Rominger Legal


 


LEGAL HELP FORUM - Potential Client ? Post your question.
LEGAL HELP FORUM - Attorney? Answer Questions, Maybe get hired!

NOW - CASE LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try it for FREE


 


Get Legal News
Enter your Email


Preview

We now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!

ADD A SEARCH ENGINE TO YOUR PAGE!!!

TELL A FRIEND ABOUT ROMINGER LEGAL

Ask Your Legal Question Now.

Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board

TERMS OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES

Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2009.

A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.