ROMINGER LEGAL
Virginia Legal Research & Resources - VA Legal Resources
Need Legal Help?
NOT FINDING WHAT YOU NEED? -CLICK HERE
This opinion or court case is from the Courts of Virginia. Search our site for more cases - CLICK HERE

LEGAL RESEARCH
COURT REPORTERS
PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS
PROCESS SERVERS
DOCUMENT RETRIEVERS
EXPERT WITNESSES

 

Find a Private Investigator

Find an Expert Witness

Find a Process Server

Case Law - save on Lexis / WestLaw.

 
Web Rominger Legal

Legal News - Legal Headlines

 

                 COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA



Present:  Judges Coleman, Willis and Senior Judge Hodges
Argued at Norfolk, Virginia


ROBERT L. BRANCH, S/K/A
ROBERT LEVON BRANCH
                                                                                                                                               MEMORANDUM OPINION BY
v.           Record No. 1408-96-1     JUDGE SAM W. COLEMAN III
                                           JULY 8, 1997
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA


       FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH
                  Von L. Piersall, Jr., Judge


         Brenda C. Spry, Deputy Public Defender, for
         appellant.

         (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General;
         Margaret Ann B. Walker, Assistant Attorney
         General, on brief), for appellee.  Appellee
         submitting on brief.


    The defendant was convicted in a bench trial of robbery in
violation of Code   18.2-58.  On appeal, he challenges the
sufficiency of the evidence to prove that he was the robber.  
Finding no error, we affirm the conviction.
    We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the
Commonwealth, as the prevailing party, and grant to it all
reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.  Higginbotham
v. Commonwealth, 216 Va. 349, 352, 218 S.E.2d 534, 537 (1975).
So viewed, the evidence proves that the victim was approached
from behind and knocked down, a coat was thrown over his head and
his pockets were emptied.  After the robbery, he told the police
officers at the scene that he had thirteen dollars in his pocket,
however, at trial he testified that he had given a friend five
dollars right before he was attacked.  The victim did not see and
could not identify his assailant.  He testified that he "just
felt the guy on me."
    Wayne Henson, a friend of the victim, testified that after
the victim left his house Henson and his cousin were alerted by
Henson's mother to go see about the victim.  When Henson and his
cousin went down the street, they found the victim on the ground
with the defendant "over top of" him and "another person there
but he was standing" nearby.  When Henson started towards the
person standing near the victim, that person ran away.  Henson
testified that in order to get the defendant "off of from on top
of" the victim "[m]y cousin tackled him" and held him until the
police arrived.  Officers C. T. Durham and Robert Joyner
testified that, after they arrived on the scene, they arrested
the defendant and recovered eight dollars from his pocket.  
    The defendant argues that because the evidence proves that
he was only standing "over top" the victim and fails to prove
that he was touching the victim, it was insufficient to prove
that he was the robber.  The defendant contends that he was
merely an observer and that the person who ran from the scene was
the robber.  However, the defendant would have us view the
evidence and reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the
light most favorable to him and to disregard the testimony from
which the fact finder could reasonably infer that he was the
robber.  In view of the testimony that the victim was on the
ground, that he "just felt the guy on me," Henson's testimony
that the defendant was "over top of" the victim, and that his
cousin "tackled" the defendant in order to get him "from on top
of" the victim, the evidence was sufficient for the fact finder
to infer that Henson and his cousin subdued the defendant and
held him until the officers arrived because the defendant was
robbing the victim.  After the defendant was arrested, he had an
amount of money on him consistent with the amount that was taken
from the victim.  The fact finder was not required to accept the
defendant's version and could infer that his story was fabricated
to conceal his guilt.  See Speight v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App.
83, 88, 354 S.E.2d 95, 98 (1987) (en banc).  Because credible
evidence supports the trial court's decision, we affirm the
conviction.
                                                     Affirmed.                                 

Ask a Lawyer

 

 

FREE CASE REVIEW BY A LOCAL LAWYER!
|
|
\/

Personal Injury Law
Accidents
Dog Bite
Legal Malpractice
Medical Malpractice
Other Professional Malpractice
Libel & Slander
Product Liability
Slip & Fall
Torts
Workplace Injury
Wrongful Death
Auto Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bankruptcy
Chapter 7
Chapter 11
Business/Corporate Law
Business Formation
Business Planning
Franchising
Tax Planning
Traffic/Transportation Law
Moving Violations
Routine Infractions
Lemon Law
Manufacturer Defects
Securities Law
Securities Litigation
Shareholder Disputes
Insider Trading
Foreign Investment
Wills & Estates

Wills

Trusts
Estate Planning
Family Law
Adoption
Child Abuse
Child Custody
Child Support
Divorce - Contested
Divorce - Uncontested
Juvenile Criminal Law
Premarital Agreements
Spousal Support
Labor/Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Sexual Harassment
Age Discrimination
Workers Compensation
Real Estate/Property Law
Condemnation / Eminent Domain
Broker Litigation
Title Litigation
Landlord/Tenant
Buying/Selling/Leasing
Foreclosures
Residential Real Estate Litigation
Commercial Real Estate Litigation
Construction Litigation
Banking/Finance Law
Debtor/Creditor
Consumer Protection
Venture Capital
Constitutional Law
Discrimination
Police Misconduct
Sexual Harassment
Privacy Rights
Criminal Law
DUI / DWI / DOI
Assault & Battery
White Collar Crimes
Sex Crimes
Homocide Defense
Civil Law
Insurance Bad Faith
Civil Rights
Contracts
Estate Planning, Wills & Trusts
Litigation/Trials
Social Security
Worker's Compensation
Probate, Will & Trusts
Intellectual Property
Patents
Trademarks
Copyrights
Tax Law
IRS Disputes
Filing/Compliance
Tax Planning
Tax Power of Attorney
Health Care Law
Disability
Elder Law
Government/Specialty Law
Immigration
Education
Trade Law
Agricultural/Environmental
IRS Issues

 


Google
Search Rominger Legal


 


LEGAL HELP FORUM - Potential Client ? Post your question.
LEGAL HELP FORUM - Attorney? Answer Questions, Maybe get hired!

NOW - CASE LAW - All 50 States - Federal Courts - Try it for FREE


 


Get Legal News
Enter your Email


Preview

We now have full text legal news
drawn from all the major sources!!

ADD A SEARCH ENGINE TO YOUR PAGE!!!

TELL A FRIEND ABOUT ROMINGER LEGAL

Ask Your Legal Question Now.

Pennsylvania Lawyer Help Board

TERMS OF USE - DISCLAIMER - LINKING POLICIES

Created and Developed by
Rominger Legal
Copyright 1997 - 2009.

A Division of
ROMINGER, INC.